Home / Players / Compare / David Warner vs Mitchell Starc

David Warner vs Mitchell Starc

Full head-to-head breakdown across Test, ODI, T20I & IPL — batting, bowling and career records

TestCareer Stats
ODIFull Comparison
T20Head to Head
IPLFranchise Stats
D
David Warner
Australia
Batsman
VS
M
Mitchell Starc
Australia
Bowler

David Warner vs Mitchell Starc: Why the Stats Make This a One-Sided Comparison

David Warner leads this head-to-head 20–0 across batting categories, pulling ahead convincingly — with the strongest edge coming in Test cricket, where David Warner averages 44.6 compared to Mitchell Starc's 20.15.

In ODI cricket, David Warner leads with an average of 45.01 versus Mitchell Starc's 11.66 — a massive gap of 33.35 runs per dismissal. David Warner has also accumulated more ODI runs overall (6,932 vs 583). David Warner's 22 ODI centuries to Mitchell Starc's 0 underlines who converts more often under pressure.

In T20 Internationals, David Warner holds the edge — averaging 33.44 at a strike rate of 142.48, while Mitchell Starc averages 9.8 at SR 98. In the IPL, David Warner leads with 6,565 runs versus 111 — a gap that reflects both opportunity and impact in franchise cricket.

Both players contribute with the ball. Mitchell Starc leads on international wickets (771 vs 4 across formats), and their all-round contributions add meaningful value beyond batting averages alone.

TEST Batting — Key Metrics
David Warner Stat Mitchell Starc
112
M
107
205
Inn
157
8786
Runs
2498
335
HS
99
44.6
Avg
20.15
70.20
SR
59.09
26
100s
0
37
50s
13
1036
4s
256
69
6s
49
13
Ducks
17
8
NO
33
Overall Profile — TEST
Key Stats — TEST

📤 Share this David Warner vs Mitchell Starc comparison

Share Share
🏆

The Verdict

Based on major batting metrics such as runs, average, centuries, strike rate, and ICC achievements, David Warner leads in most categories. Leading in both Test average (44.6 vs 20.15) and ODI average (45.01 vs 11.66), David Warner makes the stronger case across the two most respected formats in the game.

Frequently Asked — David Warner vs Mitchell Starc

David Warner leads 20–0 across the batting categories included in this comparison. David Warner has the higher batting average in both Test cricket (44.6) and ODI cricket (45.01).

David Warner holds the edge in ODI batting average, averaging 45.01 with 6932 runs, compared to Mitchell Starc's average of 11.66 and 583 runs. David Warner has also scored more ODI centuries (22 vs 0).

In Test cricket, David Warner averages 44.6 versus Mitchell Starc's 20.15 — a massive gap of 24.45 runs per dismissal. David Warner has accumulated 8,786 Test runs including 26 centuries.

In T20Is, David Warner averages 33.44 at a strike rate of 142.48, while Mitchell Starc averages 9.8 at a strike rate of 98. David Warner has the higher strike rate (142.48 vs 98).

David Warner leads in IPL run-scoring with 6,565 runs at a strike rate of 139.78, compared to Mitchell Starc's 111 runs. David Warner also leads in IPL sixes (235 vs 0), reflecting a more aggressive approach in franchise cricket.

Both players have contributed with the ball. Mitchell Starc has taken 771 international wickets compared to David Warner's 4. Mitchell Starc has the lower white-ball economy rate (6.505 vs 8).

David Warner records their highest batting average in ODIs (45.01), while Mitchell Starc records their highest batting average in Tests (20.15), highlighting strengths in different formats.

Top

We use cookies for analytics and personalised advertising. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies. Privacy Policy